Share this page on Twitter Share this page on Facebook Share this page on MySpace Share this page on Digg Share this page on StumbleUpon
Alternative Medicines - Fact Sheet PDF Print E-mail

Official logo for the Brain Injury Association of Queensland, dealing with traumatic brain injury, acquired brain injury, head injury, challenging behaviour and complex behaviour, assessments and accommodation for young people in residential aged care. People often turn to alternative medicines as an answer to issues created by a brain injury.

People with a brain injury encounter modern medicine from the moment the ambulance arrives or they get to an emergency room. Modern or “mainstream” medicine has evolved using strict scientific methods of evidence and rigorous demands for proof of efficacy (does it work?) and safety. Years of research and millions of dollars are spent to prove medical therapies safe and effective before they are approved for use outside clinical trials.

This process is slow, but it doesn’t stop. The medical community is desperate for faster, more effective treatments that have fewer side effects. Drug companies know that if they don’t continue to push the boundaries of their own knowledge, they will quickly be swamped in a highly competitive marketplace by companies that do. Practitioners know that sometimes the right medication or treatment doesn’t exist yet, and will carefully trial alternatives until the most effective, safest treatment plan can be found.

Unfortunately, the limitations of knowledge and the costs of developing, proving, marketing and distributing medications means that many people either can’t afford the treatment they desperately need, or can’t find a treatment that is effective for them. This can see them turn to alternative treatments in search of a solution and a better quality of life. Due to lack of medical knowledge, a feeling of desperation, and the hope that alternatives suggest, many families become vulnerable consumers.

What is Alternative Medicine?

Alternative medical practices are those philosophies, therapies, and medications that have not passed the standards of modern medicine. Frequently based in the philosophies, religion and medicines of traditional cultures, they have often not been studied or show only minor benefit and have not been judged worthwhile by mainstream medicine. Complementary medicine practices are mainstream medical practices which are used for purposes other than what they were proven or intended for.

Many treatments were once alternative and have become mainstream – putting mouldy bread on wounds was once just a housewife’s remedy until the antibiotic penicillin was identified, cultured, and produced in a pure form. Vitamins were found to cure scurvy and other previously unexplained illnesses, and the acidophilus cultures commonly put into supermarket yoghurt are now recognised as a major component of the heath of your intestines. The important point to note is that therapies which are still alternative are alternative because they have not succeeded in becoming mainstream, not just because they come from a non-mainstream culture. They may struggle to convince doctors who are right to be cautious about claims that seem to be miraculous, or they may simply not do what they claim to do.

There are also treatments or therapies that are effective ways to promote health even if all the claims made for their effectiveness can be questioned. Tai Chi (also spelt Dai Qi) is a very effective way to improve balance, coordination, strength, flexibility and cardio-vascular fitness. It becomes an alternative therapy when people claim that it can also cure illness, a claim that has not been reliably supported beyond the benefits of having a stronger, healthier body.

Research may not have been done because of insufficient research money, a small group of patients that would benefit, lack of people who know how to provide the therapy, or the fact that the intervention makes no scientific sense to practitioners. The research may also be lacking because the therapy is brand new and there simply has not been time to accumulate reasonable evidence. In that situation, it is doubly important to assess the potential risks of the therapy.

Potential Pitfalls

Alternative and complementary medicines are alternative and complementary because they lack unbiased, controlled research studies that prove them effective. More importantly, they may also lack unbiased, controlled research studies that prove them safe.

Another risk factor is that alternative medicines are not regulated by the same legislative controls that mainstream medications must go through. There may also not be minimum standards of qualification for the practitioners. This can result in a Physical therapy doing more harm than good, or it can result in a potentially severe reaction to an herbal treatment, or the treatment not having any effect at all despite the fact that a rival brand may have a small effect because it is made slightly differently.

The World Health Organisation reports that although 25% of modern medicines are made from plants first used traditionally, there have been many instances of deaths, heart attacks, strokes or other severe internal organ damage due to overdosing on herbal medications or an incorrect species of plant being used to make the medication.

Interactions

Many alternative medicines also interact quite badly with prescription medicines. A good example of this is St John’s Wort (hypericum perforatum), a common and widely used herbal antidepressant. Effective in assisting with stress and with minor Depression, but not moderate or severe depression, hypericum has severe interactions with a wide range of prescription medications, including antidepressants and the contraceptive pill, and its usage should be discussed with your GP.

Evaluating Alternative Medicines

Today many people use alternative medicine for a wide variety of disorders. Medical science is still Learning much about how drugs work upon the body, and about herbal and other alternative therapies. Many of these therapies may be of value without having been adequately or appropriately researched yet. It is important, however, that anybody considering an alternative therapy, or an uncommon application of a mainstream therapy, be informed about the risks and the possible costs if it doesn’t work.

Evidence Based Medicine

One method used to help evaluate alternative medical interventions is called Evidence Based Medicine. This approach asks four questions about the data supporting each medicine practice, procedure, or therapy to help decide if they are worth trying. The following list is taken from the Brain Injury Resource Foundation:

  1. Validity (believability/objectivity) - Is the supporting evidence unbiased, performed by knowledgeable researchers and published in a well respected journal? For example, if the owner of a bee farm says bee stings will improve attention span, and publishes these claims on the Internet, would they be highly valid?
  2. Importance (significant difference/benefit) - Did the results of the treatment produce a benefit that make it worth the risks? Were the “statistics” truthful and significant? For example, if the bee sting medicine was “studied” in only two patients, caused an allergic reactions in one, improved attention span for only 30 minutes, and most of that time the person was in pain from the bee sting, can it really be considered beneficial?
  3. Applicability (to put into effect) – Is the treatment performed easily, available to most people, medically possible, and cost effective? For example, if the bee sting medicine costs $1000 a day, can be kept only in the freezer, can be obtained only from one bee farmer in Alaska, and has to be injected by another person, is it applicable?
  4. Purpose (does it help or change something that makes life better) – Does it do what it should, and does it work in all populations? For example, if the bee sting medicine improved attention in one female child without brain injury, will it work in male adults with brain injury? Does a 30 minute improvement once a day mean insurance coverage should support this treatment?

If a therapy or medicine does not meet any of these criteria, then ask whether the potential benefit of this treatment is enough to justify the time, money, emotional investment and potential medical complications that could occur.

Other questions to ask

You should also look more closely at a therapy if there is a lot of controversy attached to it. Claims that there is a conspiracy to discredit a practitioner or their preferred therapy should not be trusted. Lots of individual people can be wrong, but science works and medicine progresses because the majority of trained, dedicated experts usually get it right, and will discredit a therapy because it has no effect more often than they will discredit a therapy that has not been given an opportunity to prove itself.

Claims of a miraculous cure should also be distrusted. Seemingly miraculous cures are possible, but usually take enormous amounts of time, effort or money.

Some interventions do have an effect and are medically safe but may be poor value or money or extremely time-intensive. Families may opt to pursue these if they have the time and money. Families need to consider the effect on their future security, other family members, and their emotional feelings if the results are not what they hoped for.

On the other hand, it is very difficult for science to evaluate quality of life. Even when there is a limited medical benefit from a therapy there may be a very real benefit to the patient from the sense of purpose, satisfaction, or hope that the treatment can provide.

Resources

  • Brain Injury Resource Foundation: Alternative Medicine: An Overview:
    http://www.birf.info/home/library/alt-med/altmedlib_overview.html
  • Evidence Based Medicine on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_medicine
  • Health Insite (Australian). http://www.healthinsite.gov.au/. An Australian Government Initiative, Health Insite acts as a portal to reliable health information, including a section on brain injury
  • Media Doctor Australia: http://www.mediadoctor.org.au/. Using the tagline “improving the accuracy of medical news reporting”, Media Doctor Australia examines medical reports in mainstream news media, including daily papers, and ranks each article as “Satisfactory” or “Not Satisfactory” on several criteria. If you see a news item on a treatment that sounds good, check here to see what the experts think about the story. You might need to wait a week or so for the analysis to appear.
  • Quackwatch (USA) – www.quackwatch.org. Quackwatch is a non-profit organisation dedicated to helping people without specialist education stay informed of fraudulent, unsupported or manipulative health claims.
  • National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (US): http://nccam.nih.gov/. Run by the National Institutes of Health, NCCAM is a resource for current scientific evidence and medical thinking on complementary and alternative medicines.
  • National Council Against Health Fraud (USA) - http://www.ncahf.com/. Affiliated with Quackwatch, the NCAHF has the same goal and adds to the wealth of information available.
  • World Health Organisation: Traditional Medicine: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs134/en/

 

 
logo-synapse-training-no-url-small.png

Workshops on Managing Complex and Challenging Behaviours, Positive Behaviour Support, and Introduction to ABI.  More


logo-web-sauce-no-url-small.png

Innovative and cost-effective web design solutions. Flavour your site with WebSauce and get the most from your business.  More

logo-interface-accommodation-small-no-url.png 







A range of unique Supported Accomodation and Lifestyle options are available through our Client Services. More

Share this page on Twitter Share this page on Facebook Share this page on MySpace Share this page on Digg Share this page on StumbleUpon
Home arrow Alternative medicines