|
Alternative Medicines - Fact Sheet
People often turn to
alternative medicines as an answer to issues created by a brain injury.
People with a brain injury encounter modern
medicine from the moment the ambulance arrives or they get to an emergency room.
Modern or “mainstream” medicine has evolved using strict scientific methods of
evidence and rigorous demands for proof of efficacy (does it work?) and safety.
Years of research and millions of dollars are spent to prove medical therapies
safe and effective before they are approved for use outside clinical trials.
This process is slow, but it doesn’t stop. The
medical community is desperate for faster, more effective treatments that have
fewer side effects. Drug companies know that if they don’t continue to push the
boundaries of their own knowledge, they will quickly be swamped in a highly
competitive marketplace by companies that do. Practitioners know that sometimes
the right medication or treatment doesn’t exist yet, and will carefully trial
alternatives until the most effective, safest treatment plan can be found.
Unfortunately, the limitations of knowledge
and the costs of developing, proving, marketing and distributing medications means
that many people either can’t afford the treatment they desperately need, or
can’t find a treatment that is effective for them. This can see them turn to alternative
treatments in search of a solution and a better quality of life. Due to lack of
medical knowledge, a feeling of desperation, and the hope that alternatives
suggest, many families become vulnerable consumers.
What is Alternative
Medicine?
Alternative medical practices are those
philosophies, therapies, and medications that have not passed the standards of modern
medicine. Frequently based in the philosophies, religion and medicines of traditional
cultures, they have often not been studied or show only minor benefit and have
not been judged worthwhile by mainstream medicine. Complementary medicine
practices are mainstream medical practices which are used for purposes other
than what they were proven or intended for.
Many treatments were once alternative and
have become mainstream – putting mouldy bread on wounds was once just a
housewife’s remedy until the antibiotic penicillin was identified, cultured,
and produced in a pure form. Vitamins were found to cure scurvy and other
previously unexplained illnesses, and the acidophilus cultures commonly put
into supermarket yoghurt are now recognised as a major component of the heath
of your intestines. The important point to note is that therapies which are
still alternative are alternative because they have not succeeded in becoming
mainstream, not just because they come from a non-mainstream culture. They may
struggle to convince doctors who are right to be cautious about claims that
seem to be miraculous, or they may simply not do what they claim to do.
There are also treatments or therapies that
are effective ways to promote health even if all the claims made for their
effectiveness can be questioned. Tai Chi (also spelt Dai Qi) is a very
effective way to improve balance, coordination, strength, flexibility and
cardio-vascular fitness. It becomes an alternative therapy when people claim
that it can also cure illness, a claim that has not been reliably supported
beyond the benefits of having a stronger, healthier body.
Research may not have been done because of
insufficient research money, a small group of patients that would benefit, lack
of people who know how to provide the therapy, or the fact that the
intervention makes no scientific sense to practitioners. The research may also
be lacking because the therapy is brand new and there simply has not been time
to accumulate reasonable evidence. In that situation, it is doubly important to
assess the potential risks of the therapy.
Potential Pitfalls
Alternative and complementary medicines are
alternative and complementary because they lack unbiased, controlled research
studies that prove them effective. More importantly, they may also lack
unbiased, controlled research studies that prove them safe.
Another risk factor is that alternative
medicines are not regulated by the same legislative controls that mainstream
medications must go through. There may also not be minimum standards of
qualification for the practitioners. This can result in a physical therapy
doing more harm than good, or it can result in a potentially severe reaction to
an herbal treatment, or the treatment not having any effect at all despite the
fact that a rival brand may have a small effect because it is made slightly
differently.
The World Health Organisation reports that
although 25% of modern medicines are made from plants first used traditionally,
there have been many instances of deaths, heart attacks, strokes or other
severe internal organ damage due to overdosing on herbal medications or an
incorrect species of plant being used to make the medication.
Interactions
Many alternative medicines also interact
quite badly with prescription medicines. A good example of this is St John’s Wort (hypericum
perforatum), a common and widely used herbal antidepressant. Effective in
assisting with stress and with minor depression, but not moderate or severe
depression, hypericum has severe interactions with a wide range of prescription
medications, including antidepressants and the contraceptive pill, and its
usage should be discussed with your GP.
Evaluating Alternative
Medicines
Today many people use alternative medicine
for a wide variety of disorders. Medical science is still learning much about
how drugs work upon the body, and about herbal and other alternative therapies.
Many of these therapies may be of value without having been adequately or
appropriately researched yet. It is important, however, that anybody
considering an alternative therapy, or an uncommon application of a mainstream
therapy, be informed about the risks and the possible costs if it doesn’t work.
Evidence Based Medicine
One method used to help evaluate
alternative medical interventions is called Evidence Based Medicine. This
approach asks four questions about the data supporting each medicine practice,
procedure, or therapy to help decide if they are worth trying. The following
list is taken from the Brain Injury Resource Foundation:
- Validity (believability/objectivity) - Is the supporting evidence
unbiased, performed by knowledgeable researchers and published in a well
respected journal? For example, if the owner of a bee farm says bee stings will
improve attention span, and publishes these claims on the Internet, would they
be highly valid?
- Importance (significant difference/benefit) - Did the results of the
treatment produce a benefit that make it worth the risks? Were the “statistics”
truthful and significant? For example, if the bee sting medicine was “studied”
in only two patients, caused an allergic reactions in one, improved attention
span for only 30 minutes, and most of that time the person was in pain from the
bee sting, can it really be considered beneficial?
- Applicability (to put into effect) – Is the treatment performed
easily, available to most people, medically possible, and cost effective? For
example, if the bee sting medicine costs $1000 a day, can be kept only in the
freezer, can be obtained only from one bee farmer in Alaska, and has to be
injected by another person, is it applicable?
- Purpose (does it help or change something that makes life better) –
Does it do what it should, and does it work in all populations? For example, if
the bee sting medicine improved attention in one female child without brain
injury, will it work in male adults with brain injury? Does a 30 minute
improvement once a day mean insurance coverage should support this treatment?
If a therapy or medicine does not meet any
of these criteria, then ask whether the potential benefit of this treatment is
enough to justify the time, money, emotional investment and potential medical
complications that could occur.
Other questions to ask
You should also look more closely at a
therapy if there is a lot of controversy attached to it. Claims that there is a
conspiracy to discredit a practitioner or their preferred therapy should not be
trusted. Lots of individual people can be wrong, but science works and medicine
progresses because the majority of trained, dedicated experts usually get it
right, and will discredit a therapy because it has no effect more often than
they will discredit a therapy that has not been given an opportunity to prove
itself.
Claims of a miraculous cure should also be
distrusted. Seemingly miraculous cures are possible, but usually take enormous
amounts of time, effort or money.
Some interventions do have an effect and are
medically safe but may be poor value or money or extremely time-intensive.
Families may opt to pursue these if they have the time and money. Families need
to consider the effect on their future security, other family members, and
their emotional feelings if the results are not what they hoped for.
On the other hand, it is very difficult for
science to evaluate quality of life. Even when there is a limited medical
benefit from a therapy there may be a very real benefit to the patient from the
sense of purpose, satisfaction, or hope that the treatment can provide.
Resources
-
Brain Injury Resource Foundation: Alternative Medicine: An Overview:
http://www.birf.info/home/library/alt-med/altmedlib_overview.html
-
Evidence Based Medicine on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_medicine
-
Health Insite (Australian). http://www.healthinsite.gov.au/.
An Australian Government Initiative, Health Insite acts as a portal to
reliable health information, including a section on brain injury
-
Media Doctor Australia:
http://www.mediadoctor.org.au/.
Using the tagline “improving the accuracy of medical news reporting”,
Media Doctor Australia examines medical reports in mainstream news media,
including daily papers, and ranks each article as “Satisfactory” or “Not
Satisfactory” on several criteria. If you see a news item on a treatment
that sounds good, check here to see what the experts think about the
story. You might need to wait a week or so for the analysis to appear.
-
Quackwatch (USA)
– www.quackwatch.org. Quackwatch
is a non-profit organisation dedicated to helping people without
specialist education stay informed of fraudulent, unsupported or manipulative
health claims.
-
National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
(US): http://nccam.nih.gov/. Run by
the National Institutes of Health, NCCAM is a resource for current
scientific evidence and medical thinking on complementary and alternative
medicines.
-
National Council Against Health Fraud (USA) - http://www.ncahf.com/. Affiliated with
Quackwatch, the NCAHF has the same goal and adds to the wealth of
information available.
-
World Health Organisation: Traditional Medicine: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs134/en/
|